mirror of
https://github.com/zeek/zeek.git
synced 2025-10-09 18:18:19 +00:00
Add TLS 1.3 fix and testcase.
It turns out that Chrome supports an experimental mode to support TLS 1.3, which uses a non-standard way to negotiate TLS 1.3 with a server. This non-standard way to negotiate TLS 1.3 breaks the current draft RFC and re-uses an extension on the server-side with a different binary formatting, causing us to throw a binpac exception. This patch ignores the extension when sent by the server, continuing to correctly parse the server_hello reply (as far as possible). From what I can tell this seems to be google working around the fact that MITM equipment cannot deal with TLS 1.3 server hellos; this change makes the fact that TLS 1.3 is used completely opaque unless one looks into a few extensions. We currently log this as TLS 1.2.
This commit is contained in:
parent
5efaaf1368
commit
1ede6bf7fe
5 changed files with 33 additions and 1 deletions
|
@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
|
|||
# @TEST-EXEC: bro -C -r $TRACES/tls/chrome-63.0.3211.0-canary-tls_experiment.pcap %INPUT
|
||||
# @TEST-EXEC: btest-diff ssl.log
|
||||
# @TEST-EXEC: btest-diff .stdout
|
||||
|
||||
# This is a trace that uses a completely non-standard way of establishing TLS 1.3; this seems
|
||||
# to be an undocumented extension where the TLS version is negotiated via the server sending back
|
||||
# an supported_versions extension (which, according to the RFC is strictly prohibited).
|
||||
#
|
||||
# This only seems to happen with Chrome talking to google servers. We do not recognize this as
|
||||
# TLS 1.3, but we do not abort when encountering traffic like this.
|
||||
|
||||
event ssl_extension(c: connection, is_orig: bool, code: count, val: string)
|
||||
{
|
||||
if ( ! is_orig && code == 43 )
|
||||
print bytestring_to_hexstr(val);
|
||||
}
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue