mirror of
https://github.com/zeek/zeek.git
synced 2025-10-02 06:38:20 +00:00
RecordType: Allow field init deferral of deferrable record constructors
The ctx: conn_id_ctx &default=conn_id_ctx() field was not optimized as deferrable even though by default its an empty record and so deferring initialization seems safe. Open-code the special record constructor expression case in ExprFieldInit so that the ctx field is not default initialized at record construction anymore. I am wondering a bit if the same applies to &default=set() and &default=table().
This commit is contained in:
parent
906cec9adb
commit
2cb26eda51
1 changed files with 18 additions and 1 deletions
19
src/Type.cc
19
src/Type.cc
|
@ -915,7 +915,22 @@ public:
|
|||
return {v, init_type};
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
bool IsDeferrable() const override { return false; }
|
||||
bool IsDeferrable() const override {
|
||||
if ( init_expr->Tag() == EXPR_RECORD_CONSTRUCTOR ) {
|
||||
// Special-case deferrable record construction.
|
||||
auto rce = zeek::cast_intrusive<RecordConstructorExpr>(init_expr);
|
||||
auto rt = rce->GetType<zeek::RecordType>();
|
||||
|
||||
// The empty constructor_list check here is a short-cut: If the
|
||||
// constructor expression contained only further const expressions
|
||||
// or only further deferrable record constructors, this could be
|
||||
// more aggressively deferring initializations.
|
||||
auto constructor_list = rce->Op();
|
||||
return rt->IsDeferrable() && constructor_list->Exprs().empty();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
ExprPtr InitExpr() const override { return init_expr; }
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -995,6 +1010,8 @@ private:
|
|||
if ( ! ci.second->IsDeferrable() )
|
||||
rt->creation_inits[i++] = std::move(ci);
|
||||
else {
|
||||
// std::fprintf(stderr, "deferred %s$%s: %s\n", obj_desc_short(rt).c_str(), rt->FieldName(ci.first),
|
||||
// ci.second->InitExpr() ? obj_desc_short(ci.second->InitExpr()).c_str() : "<none>");
|
||||
assert(! rt->deferred_inits[ci.first]);
|
||||
rt->deferred_inits[ci.first].swap(ci.second);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue