mirror of
https://github.com/zeek/zeek.git
synced 2025-10-06 16:48:19 +00:00
splitting off script optimization CSE into its own source files
This commit is contained in:
parent
a824bb1e4b
commit
dd389c0380
5 changed files with 384 additions and 357 deletions
|
@ -825,265 +825,6 @@ std::shared_ptr<TempVar> Reducer::FindTemporary(const ID* id) const {
|
|||
return tmp->second;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
CSE_ValidityChecker::CSE_ValidityChecker(ProfileFuncs& _pfs, const std::vector<const ID*>& _ids, const Expr* _start_e,
|
||||
const Expr* _end_e)
|
||||
: pfs(_pfs), ids(_ids) {
|
||||
start_e = _start_e;
|
||||
end_e = _end_e;
|
||||
|
||||
// Track whether this is a record assignment, in which case
|
||||
// we're attuned to assignments to the same field for the
|
||||
// same type of record.
|
||||
if ( start_e->Tag() == EXPR_FIELD ) {
|
||||
field = start_e->AsFieldExpr()->Field();
|
||||
|
||||
// Track the type of the record, too, so we don't confuse
|
||||
// field references to different records that happen to
|
||||
// have the same offset as potential aliases.
|
||||
field_type = start_e->GetOp1()->GetType();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
else
|
||||
field = -1; // flags that there's no relevant field
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
TraversalCode CSE_ValidityChecker::PreStmt(const Stmt* s) {
|
||||
auto t = s->Tag();
|
||||
|
||||
if ( t == STMT_WHEN ) {
|
||||
// These are too hard to analyze - they result in lambda calls
|
||||
// that can affect aggregates, etc.
|
||||
is_valid = false;
|
||||
return TC_ABORTALL;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if ( t == STMT_ADD || t == STMT_DELETE )
|
||||
in_aggr_mod_stmt = true;
|
||||
|
||||
return TC_CONTINUE;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
TraversalCode CSE_ValidityChecker::PostStmt(const Stmt* s) {
|
||||
if ( s->Tag() == STMT_ADD || s->Tag() == STMT_DELETE )
|
||||
in_aggr_mod_stmt = false;
|
||||
|
||||
return TC_CONTINUE;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
TraversalCode CSE_ValidityChecker::PreExpr(const Expr* e) {
|
||||
if ( e == start_e ) {
|
||||
ASSERT(! have_start_e);
|
||||
have_start_e = true;
|
||||
|
||||
// Don't analyze the expression, as it's our starting
|
||||
// point and we don't want to conflate its properties
|
||||
// with those of any intervening expressions.
|
||||
return TC_CONTINUE;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if ( e == end_e ) {
|
||||
if ( ! have_start_e )
|
||||
reporter->InternalError("CSE_ValidityChecker: saw end but not start");
|
||||
|
||||
ASSERT(! have_end_e);
|
||||
have_end_e = true;
|
||||
|
||||
// ... and we're now done.
|
||||
return TC_ABORTALL;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if ( ! have_start_e )
|
||||
// We don't yet have a starting point.
|
||||
return TC_CONTINUE;
|
||||
|
||||
// We have a starting point, and not yet an ending point.
|
||||
auto t = e->Tag();
|
||||
|
||||
switch ( t ) {
|
||||
case EXPR_ASSIGN: {
|
||||
auto lhs_ref = e->GetOp1()->AsRefExprPtr();
|
||||
auto lhs = lhs_ref->GetOp1()->AsNameExpr();
|
||||
|
||||
if ( CheckID(lhs->Id(), false) )
|
||||
return TC_ABORTALL;
|
||||
|
||||
// Note, we don't use CheckAggrMod() because this is a plain
|
||||
// assignment. It might be changing a variable's binding to
|
||||
// an aggregate ("aggr_var = new_aggr_val"), but we don't
|
||||
// introduce temporaries that are simply aliases of existing
|
||||
// variables (e.g., we don't have "<internal>::#8 = aggr_var"),
|
||||
// and so there's no concern that the temporary could now be
|
||||
// referring to the wrong aggregate. If instead we have
|
||||
// "<internal>::#8 = aggr_var$foo", then a reassignment here
|
||||
// to "aggr_var" will already be caught by CheckID().
|
||||
} break;
|
||||
|
||||
case EXPR_INDEX_ASSIGN: {
|
||||
auto lhs_aggr = e->GetOp1();
|
||||
auto lhs_aggr_id = lhs_aggr->AsNameExpr()->Id();
|
||||
|
||||
if ( CheckID(lhs_aggr_id, true) || CheckTableMod(lhs_aggr->GetType()) )
|
||||
return TC_ABORTALL;
|
||||
} break;
|
||||
|
||||
case EXPR_FIELD_LHS_ASSIGN: {
|
||||
auto lhs = e->GetOp1();
|
||||
auto lhs_aggr_id = lhs->AsNameExpr()->Id();
|
||||
auto lhs_field = e->AsFieldLHSAssignExpr()->Field();
|
||||
|
||||
if ( CheckID(lhs_aggr_id, true) )
|
||||
return TC_ABORTALL;
|
||||
if ( lhs_field == field && same_type(lhs_aggr_id->GetType(), field_type) ) {
|
||||
is_valid = false;
|
||||
return TC_ABORTALL;
|
||||
}
|
||||
} break;
|
||||
|
||||
case EXPR_APPEND_TO:
|
||||
// This doesn't directly change any identifiers, but does
|
||||
// alter an aggregate.
|
||||
if ( CheckAggrMod(e->GetType()) )
|
||||
return TC_ABORTALL;
|
||||
break;
|
||||
|
||||
case EXPR_CALL:
|
||||
if ( CheckCall(e->AsCallExpr()) )
|
||||
return TC_ABORTALL;
|
||||
break;
|
||||
|
||||
case EXPR_TABLE_CONSTRUCTOR:
|
||||
// These have EXPR_ASSIGN's in them that don't
|
||||
// correspond to actual assignments to variables,
|
||||
// so we don't want to traverse them.
|
||||
return TC_ABORTSTMT;
|
||||
|
||||
case EXPR_RECORD_COERCE:
|
||||
case EXPR_RECORD_CONSTRUCTOR:
|
||||
// Note, record coercion behaves like constructors in terms of
|
||||
// potentially executing &default functions. In either case,
|
||||
// the type of the expression reflects the type we want to analyze
|
||||
// for side effects.
|
||||
if ( CheckRecordConstructor(e->GetType()) )
|
||||
return TC_ABORTALL;
|
||||
break;
|
||||
|
||||
case EXPR_INDEX:
|
||||
case EXPR_FIELD: {
|
||||
// We treat these together because they both have to be checked
|
||||
// when inside an "add" or "delete" statement.
|
||||
auto aggr = e->GetOp1();
|
||||
auto aggr_t = aggr->GetType();
|
||||
|
||||
if ( in_aggr_mod_stmt ) {
|
||||
auto aggr_id = aggr->AsNameExpr()->Id();
|
||||
|
||||
if ( CheckID(aggr_id, true) || CheckAggrMod(aggr_t) )
|
||||
return TC_ABORTALL;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
else if ( t == EXPR_INDEX && aggr_t->Tag() == TYPE_TABLE ) {
|
||||
if ( CheckTableRef(aggr_t) )
|
||||
return TC_ABORTALL;
|
||||
}
|
||||
} break;
|
||||
|
||||
default: break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
return TC_CONTINUE;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
bool CSE_ValidityChecker::CheckID(const ID* id, bool ignore_orig) {
|
||||
for ( auto i : ids ) {
|
||||
if ( ignore_orig && i == ids.front() )
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
|
||||
if ( id == i )
|
||||
return Invalid(); // reassignment
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
bool CSE_ValidityChecker::CheckAggrMod(const TypePtr& t) {
|
||||
if ( ! IsAggr(t) )
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
|
||||
for ( auto i : ids )
|
||||
if ( same_type(t, i->GetType()) )
|
||||
return Invalid();
|
||||
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
bool CSE_ValidityChecker::CheckRecordConstructor(const TypePtr& t) {
|
||||
if ( t->Tag() != TYPE_RECORD )
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
|
||||
return CheckSideEffects(SideEffectsOp::CONSTRUCTION, t);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
bool CSE_ValidityChecker::CheckTableMod(const TypePtr& t) {
|
||||
if ( CheckAggrMod(t) )
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
|
||||
if ( t->Tag() != TYPE_TABLE )
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
|
||||
return CheckSideEffects(SideEffectsOp::WRITE, t);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
bool CSE_ValidityChecker::CheckTableRef(const TypePtr& t) { return CheckSideEffects(SideEffectsOp::READ, t); }
|
||||
|
||||
bool CSE_ValidityChecker::CheckCall(const CallExpr* c) {
|
||||
auto func = c->Func();
|
||||
std::string desc;
|
||||
if ( func->Tag() != EXPR_NAME )
|
||||
// Can't analyze indirect calls.
|
||||
return Invalid();
|
||||
|
||||
IDSet non_local_ids;
|
||||
TypeSet aggrs;
|
||||
bool is_unknown = false;
|
||||
|
||||
auto resolved = pfs.GetCallSideEffects(func->AsNameExpr(), non_local_ids, aggrs, is_unknown);
|
||||
ASSERT(resolved);
|
||||
|
||||
if ( is_unknown || CheckSideEffects(non_local_ids, aggrs) )
|
||||
return Invalid();
|
||||
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
bool CSE_ValidityChecker::CheckSideEffects(SideEffectsOp::AccessType access, const TypePtr& t) {
|
||||
IDSet non_local_ids;
|
||||
TypeSet aggrs;
|
||||
|
||||
if ( pfs.GetSideEffects(access, t.get(), non_local_ids, aggrs) )
|
||||
return Invalid();
|
||||
|
||||
return CheckSideEffects(non_local_ids, aggrs);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
bool CSE_ValidityChecker::CheckSideEffects(const IDSet& non_local_ids, const TypeSet& aggrs) {
|
||||
if ( non_local_ids.empty() && aggrs.empty() )
|
||||
// This is far and away the most common case.
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
|
||||
for ( auto i : ids ) {
|
||||
for ( auto nli : non_local_ids )
|
||||
if ( nli == i )
|
||||
return Invalid();
|
||||
|
||||
auto i_t = i->GetType();
|
||||
for ( auto a : aggrs )
|
||||
if ( same_type(a, i_t.get()) )
|
||||
return Invalid();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
const Expr* non_reduced_perp;
|
||||
bool checking_reduction;
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue