Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/topic/robin/gh-425-record-perf'

- Removed a now-unused-local-variable
- Added std::move() in AssignExpr::SetOp2()

* origin/topic/robin/gh-425-record-perf:
  Avoid unnecessary temporary value when coercing a record that's already the right type.
  Optimize record constructor expression.
  Unify type comparisions for records.
This commit is contained in:
Jon Siwek 2020-10-06 12:19:49 -07:00
commit f9f6140c15
7 changed files with 108 additions and 63 deletions

View file

@ -2164,26 +2164,16 @@ bool AssignExpr::TypeCheck(const AttributesPtr& attrs)
if ( attrs )
attr_copy = std::make_unique<std::vector<AttrPtr>>(attrs->GetAttrs());
bool empty_list_assignment = (op2->AsListExpr()->Exprs().empty());
if ( op1->GetType()->IsSet() )
op2 = make_intrusive<SetConstructorExpr>(
cast_intrusive<ListExpr>(op2), std::move(attr_copy));
cast_intrusive<ListExpr>(op2), std::move(attr_copy), op1->GetType());
else
op2 = make_intrusive<TableConstructorExpr>(
cast_intrusive<ListExpr>(op2), std::move(attr_copy));
cast_intrusive<ListExpr>(op2), std::move(attr_copy), op1->GetType());
if ( ! empty_list_assignment && ! same_type(op1->GetType(), op2->GetType()) )
{
if ( op1->GetType()->IsSet() )
ExprError("set type mismatch in assignment");
else
ExprError("table type mismatch in assignment");
return false;
}
return true;
// The constructor expressions are performing the type
// checking and will set op2 to an error state on failure.
return ! op2->IsError();
}
if ( bt1 == TYPE_VECTOR )
@ -2207,21 +2197,7 @@ bool AssignExpr::TypeCheck(const AttributesPtr& attrs)
op2->GetType()->Tag() == TYPE_RECORD )
{
if ( same_type(op1->GetType(), op2->GetType()) )
{
RecordType* rt1 = op1->GetType()->AsRecordType();
RecordType* rt2 = op2->GetType()->AsRecordType();
// Make sure the attributes match as well.
for ( int i = 0; i < rt1->NumFields(); ++i )
{
const TypeDecl* td1 = rt1->FieldDecl(i);
const TypeDecl* td2 = rt2->FieldDecl(i);
if ( same_attrs(td1->attrs.get(), td2->attrs.get()) )
// Everything matches.
return true;
}
}
return true;
// Need to coerce.
op2 = make_intrusive<RecordCoerceExpr>(std::move(op2), op1->GetType<RecordType>());
@ -3077,7 +3053,7 @@ void HasFieldExpr::ExprDescribe(ODesc* d) const
}
RecordConstructorExpr::RecordConstructorExpr(ListExprPtr constructor_list)
: UnaryExpr(EXPR_RECORD_CONSTRUCTOR, std::move(constructor_list))
: Expr(EXPR_RECORD_CONSTRUCTOR), op(std::move(constructor_list))
{
if ( IsError() )
return;
@ -3130,22 +3106,30 @@ ValPtr RecordConstructorExpr::InitVal(const zeek::Type* t, ValPtr aggr) const
return nullptr;
}
ValPtr RecordConstructorExpr::Fold(Val* v) const
ValPtr RecordConstructorExpr::Eval(Frame* f) const
{
ListVal* lv = v->AsListVal();
if ( IsError() )
return nullptr;
const auto& exprs = op->Exprs();
auto rt = cast_intrusive<RecordType>(type);
if ( lv->Length() != rt->NumFields() )
if ( exprs.length() != rt->NumFields() )
RuntimeErrorWithCallStack("inconsistency evaluating record constructor");
auto rv = make_intrusive<RecordVal>(std::move(rt));
for ( int i = 0; i < lv->Length(); ++i )
rv->Assign(i, lv->Idx(i));
for ( int i = 0; i < exprs.length(); ++i )
rv->Assign(i, exprs[i]->Eval(f));
return rv;
}
bool RecordConstructorExpr::IsPure() const
{
return op->IsPure();
}
void RecordConstructorExpr::ExprDescribe(ODesc* d) const
{
d->Add("[");
@ -3153,6 +3137,18 @@ void RecordConstructorExpr::ExprDescribe(ODesc* d) const
d->Add("]");
}
TraversalCode RecordConstructorExpr::Traverse(TraversalCallback* cb) const
{
TraversalCode tc = cb->PreExpr(this);
HANDLE_TC_EXPR_PRE(tc);
tc = op->Traverse(cb);
HANDLE_TC_EXPR_PRE(tc);
tc = cb->PostExpr(this);
HANDLE_TC_EXPR_POST(tc);
}
TableConstructorExpr::TableConstructorExpr(ListExprPtr constructor_list,
std::unique_ptr<std::vector<AttrPtr>> arg_attrs,
TypePtr arg_type)
@ -3195,17 +3191,18 @@ TableConstructorExpr::TableConstructorExpr(ListExprPtr constructor_list,
const auto& indices = type->AsTableType()->GetIndices()->GetTypes();
const ExprPList& cle = op->AsListExpr()->Exprs();
// check and promote all index expressions in ctor list
// check and promote all assign expressions in ctor list
for ( const auto& expr : cle )
{
if ( expr->Tag() != EXPR_ASSIGN )
continue;
Expr* idx_expr = expr->AsAssignExpr()->Op1();
if ( idx_expr->Tag() != EXPR_LIST )
continue;
auto idx_expr = expr->AsAssignExpr()->Op1();
auto val_expr = expr->AsAssignExpr()->Op2();
auto yield_type = GetType()->AsTableType()->Yield().get();
// Promote LHS
assert(idx_expr->Tag() == EXPR_LIST);
ExprPList& idx_exprs = idx_expr->AsListExpr()->Exprs();
if ( idx_exprs.length() != static_cast<int>(indices.size()) )
@ -3229,6 +3226,19 @@ TableConstructorExpr::TableConstructorExpr(ListExprPtr constructor_list,
}
ExprError("inconsistent types in table constructor");
return;
}
// Promote RHS
if ( auto promoted_val = check_and_promote_expr(val_expr, yield_type) )
{
if ( promoted_val != val_expr )
expr->AsAssignExpr()->SetOp2(promoted_val);
}
else
{
ExprError("inconsistent types in table constructor");
return;
}
}
}
@ -3328,8 +3338,8 @@ SetConstructorExpr::SetConstructorExpr(ListExprPtr constructor_list,
Expr* ce = cle[i];
ListExpr* le = ce->AsListExpr();
if ( ce->Tag() == EXPR_LIST &&
check_and_promote_exprs(le, type->AsTableType()->GetIndices().get()) )
assert(ce->Tag() == EXPR_LIST);
if ( check_and_promote_exprs(le, type->AsTableType()->GetIndices().get()) )
{
if ( le != cle[i] )
cle.replace(i, le);
@ -3746,6 +3756,9 @@ ValPtr RecordCoerceExpr::InitVal(const zeek::Type* t, ValPtr aggr) const
ValPtr RecordCoerceExpr::Fold(Val* v) const
{
if ( same_type(GetType(), Op()->GetType()) )
return IntrusivePtr{NewRef{}, v};
auto val = make_intrusive<RecordVal>(GetType<RecordType>());
RecordType* val_type = val->GetType()->AsRecordType();
@ -4985,18 +4998,7 @@ ExprPtr check_and_promote_expr(Expr* const e, zeek::Type* t)
RecordType* et_r = et->AsRecordType();
if ( same_type(t, et) )
{
// Make sure the attributes match as well.
for ( int i = 0; i < t_r->NumFields(); ++i )
{
const TypeDecl* td1 = t_r->FieldDecl(i);
const TypeDecl* td2 = et_r->FieldDecl(i);
if ( same_attrs(td1->attrs.get(), td2->attrs.get()) )
// Everything matches perfectly.
return {NewRef{}, e};
}
}
return {NewRef{}, e};
if ( record_promotion_compatible(t_r, et_r) )
return make_intrusive<RecordCoerceExpr>(