Intermediate lines of multiline replies usually do not contain valid status
codes (even if servers may opt to include them). Their content may be anything
and likely unrelated to the original command. There's little reason for us
trying to match them with a corresponding command.
OSS-Fuzz generated a large command reply with very many intermediate lines
which caused long processing times due to matching every line with all
currently pending commands.
This is a DoS vector against Zeek. The new ipv6-multiline-reply.trace and
ipv6-retr-samba.trace files have been extracted from the external ipv6.trace.
These have been created artificially. The tests show that for an
invalid reply line without a numeric code, with a numeric code < 100
or a numeric code not followed by a space we now raise an analyzer
violation and disable the analyzer.
oss-fuzz produced FTP traffic with a ~550KB long FTP command. Cap FTP command
length at 100 bytes, log a weird if a command is larger than that and move
on to the next. Likely it's not actual FTP traffic, but raising an
analyzer violation would allow clients an easy way to disable the analyzer
by sending an overly long command.
The added test PCAP was generated using a fake Python socket server/client.
Introduce two new events for analyzer confirmation and analyzer violation
reporting. The current analyzer_confirmation and analyzer_violation
events assume connection objects and analyzer ids are available which
is not always the case. We're already passing aid=0 for packet analyzers
and there's not currently a way to report violations from file analyzers
using analyzer_violation, for example.
These new events use an extensible Info record approach so that additional
(optional) information can be added later without changing the signature.
It would allow for per analyzer extensions to the info records to pass
analyzer specific info to script land. It's not clear that this would be
a good idea, however.
The previous analyzer_confirmation and analyzer_violation events
continue to exist, but are deprecated and will be removed with Zeek 6.1.
The server-reported file size was being collected poorly and if
a file name had a number in it, that was reported as the file
size instead of the actual size.
A new test is included to avoid reintroducing the problem.
The main change is that reassembly code (e.g. for TCP) now uses
int64/uint64 (signedness is situational) data types in place of int
types in order to support delivering data to analyzers that pass 2GB
thresholds. There's also changes in logic that accompany the change in
data types, e.g. to fix TCP sequence space arithmetic inconsistencies.
Another significant change is in the Analyzer API: the *Packet and
*Undelivered methods now use a uint64 in place of an int for the
relative sequence space offset parameter.
