Add localversion to the VersionDescription record and populate it
during version string parsing.
This change also modifies the version string syntax, removing the
deprecated dash (-) between beta|dev|rc and the commmit count; those
must now be separated by a period.
The test version strings were updated accordingly along with the
baseline.
* origin/topic/awelzel/move-iso-9660-sig-to-policy:
signatures/iso-9660: Add \x01 suffix to CD001
test-all-policy: Do not load iso-9660.zeek
signatures: Move ISO 9660 signature to policy
Changing the default_file_bof_buffer_size has subtle impact on
MIME type detection and changed the zeek-testing baseline. Do
not load this new script via test-all-policy to avoid this.
The new test was mainly an aid to understand what is actually going on.
In short, if default_file_bof_buffer_size is larger than the file MIME
detection only runs when the buffer is full, or when the file is removed.
When a file transfer happens over multiple HTTP connections, only
some or one of the http.log entries will have a proper response MIME type.
PCAP extracted from 2009-M57-day11-18.trace.gz.
The previous "fix" caused significant performance degradation without
the signature ever having a chance to trigger. Moving it to policy
seems the best compromise, the alternative being outright removing it.
The Spicy analyzer is added as a child analyzer when enabled and the
WebSocket.cc logic dispatches between the BinPac and Spicy version.
It substantially slower when tested against a somewhat artificial
2.4GB PCAP. The first flamegraph indicates that the unmask() function
stands out with 35% of all samples, and above it shared_ptr samples.
rule_added_policy allows the modification of rules just after they have
been added. This allows the implementation of some more complex features
- like changing rule states depending on insertion in other plugins.
This introduces a new hook into the Intel::seen() function that allows
users to directly interact with the result of a find() call via external
scripts.
This should solve the use-case brought up by @chrisanag1985 in
discussion #3256: Recording and acting on "no intel match found".
@Canon88 was recently asking on Slack about enabling HTTP logging for a
given connection only when an Intel match occurred and found that the
Intel::match() event would only occur on the manager. The
Intel::match_remote() event might be a workaround, but possibly running a
bit too late and also it's just an internal "detail" event that might not
be stable.
Another internal use case revolved around enabling packet recording
based on Intel matches which necessarily needs to happen on the worker
where the match happened. The proposed workaround is similar to the above
using Intel::match_remote().
This hook also provides an opportunity to rate-limit heavy hitter intel
items locally on the worker nodes, or even replacing the event approach
currently used with a customized approach.
A continuation frame has the same type as the first frame, but that
information wasn't used nor kept, resulting payload of continuation
frames not being forwarded. The pcap was created with a fake Python
server and a bit of message crafting.
* origin/topic/awelzel/3424-http-upgrade-websocket-v1:
websocket: Handle breaking from WebSocket::configure_analyzer()
websocket: Address review feedback for BinPac code
fuzzers: Add WebSocket fuzzer
websocket: Fix crash for fragmented messages
websocket: Verify Sec-WebSocket-Key/Accept headers and review feedback
btest/websocket: Test for coalesced reply-ping
HTTP/CONNECT: Also weird on extra data in reply
HTTP/Upgrade: Weird when more data is available
ContentLine: Add GetDeliverStreamRemainingLength() accessor
HTTP: Drain event queue after instantiating upgrade analyzer
btest/http: Explain switching-protocols test change as comment
WebSocket: Introduce new analyzer and log
HTTP: Add mechanism to instantiate Upgrade analyzer
The &transient attribute does not work well with $element as that won't
be available within &until anymore apparently.
Found after a few seconds building out the fuzzer.
Don't log them, they are random and arbitrary in the normal case. Users
can do the following to log them if wanted.
redef += WebSocket::Info$client_key += { &log };
redef += WebSocket::Info$server_accept += { &log };
Add a constructed PCAP where the HTTP/websocket server send a WebSocket
ping message directly with the packet of the HTTP reply. Ensure this is
interpreted the same as if the WebSocket message is in a separate packet
following the HTTP reply.
For the server side this should work, for the client side we'd need to
synchronize suspend parsing the client side as we currently cannot quite
know whether it's a pipelined HTTP request following, or upgraded protocol
data and we don't have "suspend parsing" functionality here.
DPD enables HTTP based on the content of the WebSocket frames. However,
it's not HTTP, the protocol is x-kaazing-handshake and the server sends
some form of status/acknowledge to the client first, so the HTTP and the
HTTP analyzer receives that as the first bytes of the response and
bails, oh well.
This adds a new WebSocket analyzer that is enabled with the HTTP upgrade
mechanism introduced previously. It is a first implementation in BinPac with
manual chunking of frame payload. Configuration of the analyzer is sketched
via the new websocket_handshake() event and a configuration BiF called
WebSocket::__configure_analyzer(). In short, script land collects WebSocket
related HTTP headers and can forward these to the analyzer to change its
parsing behavior at websocket_handshake() time. For now, however, there's
no actual logic that would change behavior based on agreed upon extensions
exchanged via HTTP headers (e.g. frame compression). WebSocket::Configure()
simply attaches a PIA_TCP analyzer to the WebSocket analyzer for dynamic
protocol detection (or a custom analyzer if set). The added pcaps show this
in action for tunneled ssh, http and https using wstunnel. One test pcap is
Broker's WebSocket traffic from our own test suite, the other is the
Jupyter websocket traffic from the ticket/discussion.
This commit further adds a basic websocket.log that aggregates the WebSocket
specific headers (Sec-WebSocket-*) headers into a single log.
Closes#3424
The BDAT analyzer should be supporting uint64_t sized chunks reasonably well,
but the ContentLine analyzer does not, And also, I totally got types for
RemainingChunkSize() and in DeliverStream() wrong, resulting in overflows
and segfaults when very large chunk sizes were used.
Tickled by OSS-Fuzz. Actually running the fuzzer locally only took a
few minutes to find the crash, too. Embarrassing.
OSS-Fuzz managed to produce a MIME multipart message construction with
thousands of nested entities (or that's what Zeek makes out of it anyhow).
Prevent such deep analysis by capping at a nesting depth of 100,
preventing unnecessary resource usage. A new weird named exceeded_mime_max_depth
is reported when this limit is reached.
This change reduces the runtime of the OSS-Fuzz reproducer from ~45 seconds
to ~2.5 seconds.
The test PCAP was produced from a Python script using the email package
and sending the rendered version via POST to a HTTP server.
Closes#208
OSS-Fuzz found that providing an invalid BDAT line would tickle an
assert in UpdateState(). The BDAT state was never initialized, but
within UpdateState() that was expected.
This also removes the AnalyzerViolation() call for bad BDAT commands
and instead raises a weird. The SMTP analyzer is very lax and not triggering
the violation allows to parse the server's response to such an invalid
command.
PCAP files produced by a custom Python SMTP client against Postfix.
The initial (prefix) and final (suffix) strings are specified individually
with a variable number of "any" matches that can occur between these.
The previous implementation assumed a single string and rendered it
as *<string>*.
Reported and PCAP provided by @martinvanhensbergen, thanks!
Closeszeek/spicy-ldap#27
Skimming through the RFC, the previous approach of having containers for most
fields seems unfounded for normal protocol operation. The new weirds could just
as well be considered protocol violations. Outside of duplicated or missed data
they just shouldn't happen for well-behaved client/server behavior.
Additionally, with non-conformant traffic it would be trivial to cause
unbounded state growth and immense log record sizes.
Unfortunately, things have become a bit clunky now.
Closes#3504
