This introduces ian options, DPD::track_removed_services_in_connection.
It adds failed services to the services column, prefixed with a
"-".
Alternatively, this commit also adds
policy/protocols/conn/failed-services.zeek, which provides the same
information in a new column in conn.log.
This commit revamps the handling of analyzer violations that happen
before an analyzer confirms the protocol.
The current state is that an analyzer is disabled after 5 violations, if
it has not been confirmed. If it has been confirmed, it is disabled
after a single violation.
The reason for this is a historic mistake. In Zeek up to versions 1.5,
analyzers were unconditianally removed when they raised the first
protocol violation.
When this script was ported to the new layout for Zeek 2.0 in
b4b990cfb5, a logic error was introduced
that caused analyzers to no longer be disabled if they were not
confirmed.
This was the state for ~8 years, till the DPD::max_violations options
was added, which instates the current approach of disabling unconfirmed
analyzers after 5 violations. Sadly, there is not much discussion about
this change - from my hazy memory, I think this was discovered during
performance tests and the new behavior was added without checking into
the history of previous changes.
This commit reinstates the originally intended behavior of DPD. When an
analyzer that has not been confirmed raises a protocol violation, it is
immediately removed from the connection. This also makes a lot of sense
- this allows the analyzer to be in a "tasting" phase at the beginning
of the connection, and to error out quickly once it realizes that it was
attached to a connection not containing the desired protocol.
This change also removes the DPD::max_violations option, as it no longer
serves any purpose after this change. (In practice, the option remains
with an &deprecated warning, but it is no longer used for anything).
There are relatively minimal test-baseline changes due to this; they are
mostly triggered by the removal of the data structure and by less
analyzer errors being thrown, as unconfirmed analyzers are disabled
after the first error.
This switches the DPD logic to always log analyzers that raised a
protocol confirmation.
The logic is that, once a protocol has been confirmed - and thus there
probably is log output - it does not make sense to later remove it from
the log. It does make sense to somehow flag it as failed - but that
seems like a secondary step.
Introduce two new events for analyzer confirmation and analyzer violation
reporting. The current analyzer_confirmation and analyzer_violation
events assume connection objects and analyzer ids are available which
is not always the case. We're already passing aid=0 for packet analyzers
and there's not currently a way to report violations from file analyzers
using analyzer_violation, for example.
These new events use an extensible Info record approach so that additional
(optional) information can be added later without changing the signature.
It would allow for per analyzer extensions to the info records to pass
analyzer specific info to script land. It's not clear that this would be
a good idea, however.
The previous analyzer_confirmation and analyzer_violation events
continue to exist, but are deprecated and will be removed with Zeek 6.1.
...the only known cases where the `-` for `connection$service` was
handled is to skip/ignore these analyzers.
Slight suspicion that join_string_set() should maybe become a bif
now determine_service() runs once for each connection.
Closes#2388
* Because frameworks/analyzer is loaded via init-frameworks-and-bifs the
dpd functionality (really just dpd.log and disabling of analyzers) is
now enabled even in bare mode.
* Not sure we need to keep frameworks/base/dpd/__load__.zeek around
or can just remove it right away.
2022-08-31 16:50:47 +02:00
Renamed from scripts/base/frameworks/dpd/main.zeek (Browse further)
