Initial fuzzing caused a bind response to arrive before a bind request,
resulting in an unset field expression error:
expression error in base/protocols/ldap/main.zeek, line 270: field value missing (LDAP::m$opcode)
Prevent this by ensuring m$opcode is set and raising instead.
PCAP was produced with a local OpenLDAP server configured to support StartTLS.
This puts the Zeek calls into a separate ldap_zeek.spicy file/module
to separate it from LDAP.
Skimming through the RFC, the previous approach of having containers for most
fields seems unfounded for normal protocol operation. The new weirds could just
as well be considered protocol violations. Outside of duplicated or missed data
they just shouldn't happen for well-behaved client/server behavior.
Additionally, with non-conformant traffic it would be trivial to cause
unbounded state growth and immense log record sizes.
Unfortunately, things have become a bit clunky now.
Closes#3504
* origin/topic/bbannier/issue-3234:
Introduce dedicated `LDAP::Info`
Remove redundant storing of protocol in LDAP logs
Use LDAP `RemovalHook` instead of implementing `connection_state_remove`
Tidy up LDAP code by using local references
Pluralize container names in LDAP types
Move LDAP script constants to their own file
Name `LDAP::Message` and `LDAP::Search` `*Info`
Make ports for LDAP analyzers fully configurable
Require have-spicy for tests which log spicy-ldap information
Fix LDAP analyzer setup for when Spicy analyzers are disabled
Bump zeek-testing-private
Integrate spicy-ldap test suite
Move spicy-ldap into Zeek protocol analyzer tree
Explicitly use all of spicy-ldap's modules
Explicitly list `asn1.spicy` as spicy-ldap source
Remove uses of `zeek` module in spicy-ldap
Fix typos in spicy-ldap
Remove project configuration files in spicy-ldap
Integrate spicy-ldap into build
Import zeek/spicy-ldap@57b5eff988
This moves the ports the LDAP analyzers should be triggered on from the
EVT file to the Zeek module. This gives users full control over which
ports the analyzers are registered for while previously they could only
register them for additional ports (there is no Zeek script equivalent
of `Manager::UnregisterAnalyzerForPort`).
The analyzers could still be triggered via DPD, but this is intentional.
To fully disable analyzers users can use e.g.,
```zeek
event zeek_init()
{
Analyzer::disable_analyzer(Analyzer::ANALYZER_LDAP_TCP);
}
```
